June 5, 2014
From small ankle tattoos to tattooed sleeves, I am seeing tattoos on men and womenmore and more frequently. In fact, an estimated 40 million Americans have at least one tattoo, and tattoo parlors are one of the fastest growing businesses in the U.S.
With the increased popularity of tattoos comes the question of their morality. After all, a tattoo is a permanent marking of the body—a serious issue to be sure. So are they wrong? Should a good Catholic get one?
I am wellaware that the answers to this question vary widely. Some feel strongly thatmarking your body is always immoral. Others see tattoos as a perfectly legitimate form of self expression. But personal feelings aside, is there an objective answer?Let’s take a look.
Right or Wrong?
Theprimary argument opponents of tattoos cite is the Levitical lawprohibiting them. Leviticus 19:28says, “Do not lacerate your bodies for the dead, and do not tattoo yourselves. I am the LORD.”
While this sounds like a fairly clear condemnation of tattoos, we have to keep in mind the context of the Old Testament law. It’s fairly obviousto me that the prohibition against tattoos was directly related to pagan worship, just as the prohibition against graven images was.
But regardless of the original intent,it is Catholic teaching that the old covenantceremonial law no longer applies to us as new covenant faithful, and to say otherwise is contrary to the whole message of the New Testament.For example, immediately preceding and following thatverse are prohibitions against trimming one’s beard and eating red meat. Now, I recently ate a medium rare steak, and I’m pretty confident I didn’t sin. I also regularly trim my beard, which also isn’t a sin (though some might think it is!).
There are literally hundreds ofold covenantlaws that no longer apply to us as Christians. We can’t cherry pick laws from theOld Testament touse as ammunition for our personal preferences. Either wefollow them all, or we don’t—and St. Paul makes it perfectly clear that the ceremonial law is no longer binding.
I’ll cut to the chase: There is nothing immoral about tattoos. Mother Church has never condemned them, and neither canI. It is one of those areas where a Catholic must follow his or her conscience.
Personally, I wouldn’tget a tattoo. Idon’t find them attractive, and they are far too permanent for my taste. That said, those of us who dislike tattoos should be careful never to judge a brother or sister in Christ who chooses to get one.
Danger, Will Robinson, Danger
While tattoos may not be immoral, Istrongly believethey need to be approached with an extra degree of caution and prudencedue to their permanence.Yes,they can sometimes beremoved, but this is a painful and expensive process. Accordingly, you should nevergetone lightly or flippantly, nor should you cover your body in things that are displeasing to God (a naked or scantily clad lady on your arm is a not acceptable).
Here are two things you should keep in mind if you are considering a tattoo.
1. Type– One of the most important decisions regarding tattoos is what kind you choose to get. This may seem rather obvious, but I know far too many individuals who have gotten a tattoo they later regretted. Whether it’s the name of an ex-girlfriend, an obscene image, or a curse word, there are some things you don’t want marking your body forever.And while tattoos themselvesmay be amoral, your choice of tattoo can be indeed be immoral depending on what it is.
If you decide to get a tattoo, think of it as putting on a piece of clothing that you will be wearing forever. If you can’t imagine yourself wearing it when you’re 50 or 70 years old, you shouldn’t get it. Take extra time to examine your motives. Is this a rash decision motivated by peer pressure or an attempt to be cool? Or is something deeply meaningful to you?
I have seen beautiful tattoos of Our Lady of Guadalupe or the Sacred Heart that werechosen out of devotion and love. But I have also seen“Murder” tattooed on someone’s neck and Betty Boop on someone’s arm. Some choices are clearlybetter than others, and some are indeed immoral.
When choosing a tattoo,the best rule is that ofSt. Paul: Whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable.
2. Degree – Another consideration that warrants prudence is the amount and placement of tattoos. Your face, neck, or other highly visible areas are probably not wise places to mark your body. In other words,don’t express your grief by getting tattoo tears!
As with anything, moderation is also important. While a tattoo is not wrong, it is excessive and probably immoralto cover your entire body in ink. It is certainly not in accord with the virtue of temperance and the scriptural command to exercise “moderation in all things.”I admitit is difficult to choose a point when tattoos become excessive, butit is always best to exercisea high degree of caution.
Conclusion
Opinions are strong on both sides of this issue, and I’m sure there will be some readers who disagree with my assessment. Still, love them or hate them, I can find nothing that prohibits a Catholic from getting a tattoo, and we must be careful not to make this a moral issue when there is no clear magisterial teaching on it. Still, as with anything in the Christian life, the virtues of temperance, charity,and prudence apply.
