Why carbon capture and storage is not a real climate solution (2024)

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is often pointed to as a climate solution by Big Oil and Gas. Here are the main reasons why it isn’t a climate solution.

Why carbon capture and storage is not a real climate solution (1)

What is carbon capture and storage?

Carbon capture and storage, or CCS, involves capturing CO2 from sources such as power generation and industrial facilities that use fossil fuels. The captured CO2 is compressed and transported, used to extract more oil or injected into deep geological formations.

Why carbon capture and storage is not a real climate solution (2)

Addresses just 15 per cent of oil and gas emissions

Five decades after the first carbon capture project, the technology has captured just 0.001 per cent of global emissions. Using the technology does not have any impact on the approximately 80 per cent of oil and gas emissions from downstream use when fossil fuels are burned in places like cars and furnaces.

Why carbon capture and storage is not a real climate solution (3)

Used to extract more oil and increase production

CCS can grow the very emissions it should reduce. Most of the CO2 being captured is being used to pump more oil out of the ground that would have been out of reach. Seventy per cent of carbon captured through CCS in Canada is used to help extract more oil.

Why carbon capture and storage is not a real climate solution (4)

One of the most expensive ways to reduce emissions

Most CCS projects never get off the ground because the technology is too expensive. Reducing oil and gas emissions with carbon capture can cost up to 10 times more than cutting the same emissions using wind and solar. CCS has benefited from more than $9 billion in support from the federal government to date, a subsidy to the hugely profitable fossil fuel industry.

Why carbon capture and storage is not a real climate solution (5)

Uses a lot of energy

Building carbon capture infrastructure, capturing and compressing CO2, building more infrastructure to pipe captured carbon and developing geological storage sites require lots of energy.

Why carbon capture and storage is not a real climate solution (6)

Slow to be built

There are seven CCS projects operating in Canada, capturing about 0.5 per cent of national emissions. Building more CCS projects would not have a meaningful impact on national emissions in the critical decade ahead.

Why carbon capture and storage is not a real climate solution (7)

Misses climate goals

CCS does not address the necessity of rapidly shifting from fossil fuel use to keep global warming below catastrophic levels within this decade.

Why carbon capture and storage is not a real climate solution (8)

Real climate solutions are more effective and affordable

It has never been easier or more affordable to use options like renewable energy, electrifying homes and transportation and making buildings and industries more energy-efficient.

Why carbon capture and storage is not a real climate solution (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Sen. Ignacio Ratke

Last Updated:

Views: 5696

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (56 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Sen. Ignacio Ratke

Birthday: 1999-05-27

Address: Apt. 171 8116 Bailey Via, Roberthaven, GA 58289

Phone: +2585395768220

Job: Lead Liaison

Hobby: Lockpicking, LARPing, Lego building, Lapidary, Macrame, Book restoration, Bodybuilding

Introduction: My name is Sen. Ignacio Ratke, I am a adventurous, zealous, outstanding, agreeable, precious, excited, gifted person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.